<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keywords in Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickyjurd.com/keywords-in-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickyjurd.com/keywords-in-domains/</link>
	<description>Effective Small Business Websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 05:36:32 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.nickyjurd.com/keywords-in-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickyjurd.com/?p=83#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Very good points there nicky. I guess it comes down to whether or not you want to push a search term or a specific brand.

Because the very 2.0 names such as flikr, digg etc all rely on their branding being the search terms, not an English logical search term ie &#039;voteable news website&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good points there nicky. I guess it comes down to whether or not you want to push a search term or a specific brand.</p>
<p>Because the very 2.0 names such as flikr, digg etc all rely on their branding being the search terms, not an English logical search term ie &#8216;voteable news website&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
